You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multi-site investigation of strategies for the clinical implementation of CYP2D6 genotyping to guide drug prescribing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genetics in Medicine, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41436-019-0484-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Larisa H. Cavallari, Sara L. Van Driest, Cynthia A. Prows, Jeffrey R. Bishop, Nita A. Limdi, Victoria M. Pratt, Laura B. Ramsey, D. Max Smith, Sony Tuteja, Benjamin Q. Duong, J. Kevin Hicks, James C. Lee, Aniwaa Owusu Obeng, Amber L. Beitelshees, Gillian C. Bell, Kathryn Blake, Daniel J. Crona, Lynn Dressler, Ryan A. Gregg, Lindsay J. Hines, Stuart A. Scott, Richard C. Shelton, Kristin Wiisanen Weitzel, Julie A. Johnson, Josh F. Peterson, Philip E. Empey, Todd C. Skaar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 46% |
| Israel | 1 | 8% |
| Chile | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 77% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 30 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 30 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,575,167
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#1,362
of 2,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,079
of 364,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#38
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.