↓ Skip to main content

Validity of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Among Veterans Seeking Treatment for Substance Use Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Validity of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Among Veterans Seeking Treatment for Substance Use Disorders
Published in
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11469-013-9435-4
Authors

Josephine M. DeMarce, Steven J. Lash, Jefferson D. Parker, Randy S. Burke, Steven C. Grambow

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Librarian 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 12 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 44%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Unknown 11 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#16,223,992
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
#625
of 1,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,634
of 195,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.