You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
“I was Right about Vaccination”: Confirmation Bias and Health Literacy in Online Health Information Seeking
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Health Communication, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1080/10810730.2019.1583701 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Corine S. Meppelink, Edith G. Smit, Marieke L. Fransen, Nicola Diviani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
| Scientists | 3 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 296 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 296 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 8% |
| Librarian | 19 | 6% |
| Researcher | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 55 | 19% |
| Unknown | 125 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 45 | 15% |
| Psychology | 33 | 11% |
| Arts and Humanities | 16 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 39 | 13% |
| Unknown | 136 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2022.
All research outputs
#632,978
of 23,500,709 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Health Communication
#41
of 1,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,886
of 352,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Health Communication
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,500,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.