↓ Skip to main content

Can small groups avoid the tragedy of the commons?

Overview of attention for article published in AI & SOCIETY, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Can small groups avoid the tragedy of the commons?
Published in
AI & SOCIETY, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00146-017-0720-9
Authors

Rogerio Scabim Morano, Edmilson Alves de Moraes, Rafael Ricardo Jacomossi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 8 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 9 29%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Arts and Humanities 2 6%
Design 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 8 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2019.
All research outputs
#16,454,538
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from AI & SOCIETY
#511
of 760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,305
of 313,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AI & SOCIETY
#11
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.