↓ Skip to main content

Trends in the Use of Common Words and Patient-Centric Language in the Titles of Medical Journals, 1976-2015

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Network Open, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
27 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Trends in the Use of Common Words and Patient-Centric Language in the Titles of Medical Journals, 1976-2015
Published in
JAMA Network Open, March 2019
DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1083
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregory M. Chen, Sarshan R. Pather, Horace M. DeLisser

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 18%
Lecturer 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 4 24%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 12%
Psychology 2 12%
Unspecified 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 4 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,458,322
of 24,950,117 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#5,242
of 9,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,288
of 357,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#119
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,950,117 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 129.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.