↓ Skip to main content

Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in Infants and Children with Infantile Pompe Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Dysphagia, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in Infants and Children with Infantile Pompe Disease
Published in
Dysphagia, September 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00455-009-9252-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harrison N. Jones, Carolyn W. Muller, Min Lin, Suhrad G. Banugaria, Laura E. Case, Jennifer S. Li, Gwendolyn O’Grady, James H. Heller, Priya S. Kishnani

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 15%
Student > Postgraduate 8 14%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 11 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 12%
Psychology 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 11 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2021.
All research outputs
#7,862,539
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Dysphagia
#597
of 1,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,629
of 93,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dysphagia
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.