| Title |
Plantar flexion: an effective training for peripheral arterial disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, August 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-008-0826-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eivind Wang, Jan Hoff, Henrik Loe, Nils Kaehler, Jan Helgerud |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 14% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 19% |
| Unknown | 20 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 14 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2012.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#2,159
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,264
of 93,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#7
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.