Title |
Combined T2* and T1 measurements for improved perfusion and permeability studies in high field using dynamic contrast enhancement
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Radiology, April 2006
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00330-006-0198-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cedric de Bazelaire, Neil M. Rofsky, Guillaume Duhamel, Jingbo Zhang, M. Dror Michaelson, Daniel George, David C. Alsop |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chile | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 74 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 21 | 27% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 26% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
Professor | 5 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 15% |
Unknown | 10 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 35% |
Physics and Astronomy | 14 | 18% |
Neuroscience | 8 | 10% |
Engineering | 7 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 12 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2014.
All research outputs
#7,473,822
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#1,124
of 4,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,478
of 66,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#4
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.