↓ Skip to main content

Association of Chromosome 9p21 with Subsequent Coronary Heart Disease Events: A GENIUS-CHD Study of Individual Participant Data

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association of Chromosome 9p21 with Subsequent Coronary Heart Disease Events: A GENIUS-CHD Study of Individual Participant Data
Published in
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine, March 2019
DOI 10.1161/circgen.119.002471
Pubmed ID
Authors

Riyaz S. Patel, Amand F. Schmidt, Vinicius Tragante, Raymond O. McCubrey, Michael V. Holmes, Laurence J. Howe, Kenan Direk, Axel Åkerblom, Karin Leander, Salim S. Virani, Karol A. Kaminski, Jochen D. Muehlschlegel, Marie-Pierre Dubé, Hooman Allayee, Peter Almgren, Maris Alver, Ekaterina V. Baranova, Hassan Behlouli, Bram Boeckx, Peter S. Braund, Lutz P. Breitling, Graciela Delgado, Nubia E. Duarte, Line Dufresne, Niclas Eriksson, Luisa Foco, Crystel M. Gijsberts, Yan Gong, Jaana Hartiala, Mahyar Heydarpour, Jaroslav A. Hubacek, Marcus Kleber, Daniel Kofink, Pekka Kuukasjärvi, Vei-Vei Lee, Andreas Leiherer, Petra A. Lenzini, Daniel Levin, Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen, Nicola Martinelli, Ute Mons, Christopher P. Nelson, Kjell Nikus, Anna P. Pilbrow, Rafal Ploski, Yan V. Sun, Michael W.T. Tanck, W.H.Wilson Tang, Stella Trompet, Sander W. van der Laan, Jessica van Setten, Ragnar O. Vilmundarson, Chiara Viviani Anselmi, Efthymia Vlachopoulou, Eric Boerwinkle, Carlo Briguori, John F. Carlquist, Kathryn F. Carruthers, Gavino Casu, John Deanfield, Panos Deloukas, Frank Dudbridge, Natalie Fitzpatrick, Bruna Gigante, Stefan James, Marja-Liisa Lokki, Paulo A. Lotufo, Nicola Marziliano, Ify R. Mordi, Joseph B. Muhlestein, Chris Newton Cheh, Jan Pitha, Christoph H. Saely, Ayman Samman-Tahhan, Pratik B. Sandesara, Andrej Teren, Adam Timmis, Frans Van de Werf, Els Wauters, Arthur A.M. Wilde, Ian Ford, David J. Stott, Ale Algra, Maria G. Andreassi, Diego Ardissino, Benoit J. Arsenault, Christie M. Ballantyne, Thomas O. Bergmeijer, Connie R. Bezzina, Simon C. Body, Peter Bogaty, Gert J. de Borst, Hermann Brenner, Ralph Burkhardt, Clara Carpeggiani, Gianluigi Condorelli, Rhonda M. Cooper-DeHoff, Sharon Cresci, Ulf de Faire, Robert N. Doughty, Heinz Drexel, James C. Engert, Keith A.A. Fox, Domenico Girelli, Emil Hagström, Stanley L. Hazen, Claes Held, Harry Hemingway, Imo E. Hoefer, G. Kees Hovingh, Julie A. Johnson, Pim A. de Jong, J. Wouter Jukema, Marcin P. Kaczor, Mika Kähönen, Jiri Kettner, Marek Kiliszek, Olaf H. Klungel, Bo Lagerqvist, Diether Lambrechts, Jari O. Laurikka, Terho Lehtimäki, Daniel Lindholm, Bakhtawar K. Mahmoodi, Anke H. Maitland-van der Zee, Ruth McPherson, Olle Melander, Andres Metspalu, Witold Pepinski, Oliviero Olivieri, Grzegorz Opolski, Colin N. Palmer, Gerard Pasterkamp, Carl J. Pepine, Alexandre C. Pereira, Louise Pilote, Arshed A. Quyyumi, A. Mark Richards, Marek Sanak, Markus Scholz, Agneta Siegbahn, Juha Sinisalo, J. Gustav Smith, John A. Spertus, Alexandre F.R. Stewart, Wojciech Szczeklik, Anna Szpakowicz, Jurriën M. ten Berg, George Thanassoulis, Joachim Thiery, Yolanda van der Graaf, Frank L.J. Visseren, Johannes Waltenberger, CARDIoGRAMPlusC4D Consortium, Pim Van der Harst, Jean-Claude Tardif, Naveed Sattar, Chim C. Lang, Guillaume Pare, James M. Brophy, Jeffrey L. Anderson, Winfried März, Lars Wallentin, Vicky A. Cameron, Benjamin D. Horne, Nilesh J. Samani, Aroon D. Hingorani, Folkert W. Asselbergs

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 106 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 17 16%
Researcher 13 12%
Other 8 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Student > Master 6 6%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 39 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 44 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2022.
All research outputs
#4,949,373
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
#374
of 1,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,490
of 367,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
#7
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,097 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.