Title |
Regulating advance decision-making: potential and challenges for Malaysia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Asian Bioethics Review, March 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s41649-019-00078-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hui Yun Chan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Singapore | 2 | 29% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Netherlands | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 4 | 16% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 12% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 20% |
Unknown | 7 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 24% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 20% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
Psychology | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 7 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2019.
All research outputs
#7,213,098
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from Asian Bioethics Review
#109
of 262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,018
of 367,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asian Bioethics Review
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.