↓ Skip to main content

Effects of acupuncture and heating on blood volume and oxygen saturation of human Achilles tendon in vivo

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
Title
Effects of acupuncture and heating on blood volume and oxygen saturation of human Achilles tendon in vivo
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, February 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00421-010-1368-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keitaro Kubo, Hiroyoshi Yajima, Miho Takayama, Toshihiro Ikebukuro, Hideyuki Mizoguchi, Nobuari Takakura

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of acupuncture (dry needling) and heating (application of hot pack) treatments on the blood volume and oxygen saturation of the human Achilles tendon in vivo. Nine healthy males participated in this study. During the treatments (acupuncture and heating; both 10 min) and recovery period (30 min), the blood volume and oxygen saturation of the Achilles tendon were measured using red laser lights. During needle insertion, the blood volume and oxygen saturation of the tendon increased significantly from the pre-treatment level and these values remained high throughout the 30-min recovery period. During heating treatment, the blood volume and oxygen saturation of the tendon also increased significantly. Although the increased blood volume was not maintained after removal of the hot pack, the oxygen saturation remained significantly elevated throughout the 30-min recovery period. These results suggested that acupuncture and heating treatments enhanced the blood flow in the tendon. The long-lasting increase, especially with acupuncture treatment, in the blood supply to the tendon implies that these treatments may have therapeutic effects on injured tendons.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 115 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 20%
Student > Bachelor 24 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Other 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 17 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 13%
Sports and Recreations 14 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 22 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2023.
All research outputs
#15,092,197
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#2,859
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,630
of 172,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#26
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.