↓ Skip to main content

Perceived differences between intensivists and infectious diseases consultants facing antimicrobial resistance: a global cross-sectional survey

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Perceived differences between intensivists and infectious diseases consultants facing antimicrobial resistance: a global cross-sectional survey
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10096-019-03530-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jordi Rello, Vandana Kalwaje Eshwara, Andrew Conway-Morris, Leonel Lagunes, Joana Alves, Emine Alp, Zhongheng Zhang, Mervyn Mer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Researcher 8 13%
Other 6 10%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 16 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 18 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#3,142,513
of 24,460,744 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#229
of 2,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,607
of 356,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#8
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,460,744 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.