| Title |
Novel dry powder preparations of whole inactivated influenza virus for nasal vaccination
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
AAPS PharmSciTech, October 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1208/pt0804081 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert J. Garmise, Herman F. Staats, Anthony J. Hickey |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hungary | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 22% |
| Researcher | 16 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 17 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 16% |
| Engineering | 8 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2023.
All research outputs
#5,329,699
of 25,002,811 outputs
Outputs from AAPS PharmSciTech
#242
of 1,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,187
of 79,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AAPS PharmSciTech
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,002,811 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.