↓ Skip to main content

Learning changes the attentional status of prospective memories

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Learning changes the attentional status of prospective memories
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, February 2016
DOI 10.3758/s13423-016-1008-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dirk van Moorselaar, Jan Theeuwes, Christian N. L. Olivers

Abstract

Objects in visual working memory (VWM) that are only prospectively relevant can nevertheless affect the guidance of attention in an ongoing visual search task. Here we investigated whether learning changes the attentional status of such prospective memories. Observers performed a visual search while holding an item in memory for a later memory test. This prospective memory was then repeated for several trials. When the memory was new, it interfered with the ongoing search task. However, with repetition, memory performance increased but memory-based interference rapidly diminished, suggesting that observers learned to shield the prospective memory from the ongoing task. This contrasts with earlier findings showing stronger attentional biases from learned memories when these are immediately task-relevant. Interestingly, interference resurfaced again in anticipation of a new memory, suggesting a reactivation of VWM. These effects were sensitive to task context, indicating that the attentional status of prospective memories is flexible.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 23%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 13 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 47%
Neuroscience 6 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Unknown 16 34%