↓ Skip to main content

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Localized Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, December 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
194 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Localized Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, December 2001
DOI 10.1007/s10434-001-0758-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebekah R. White, Herbert I. Hurwitz, Michael A. Morse, Catherine Lee, Mitchell S. Anscher, Erik K. Paulson, Marcia R. Gottfried, John Baillie, Malcolm S. Branch, Paul S. Jowell, Kevin M. McGrath, Bryan M. Clary, Theodore N. Pappas, Douglas S. Tyler

Abstract

The use of neoadjuvant (preoperative) chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for pancreatic cancer has been advocated for its potential ability to optimize patient selection for surgical resection and to downstage locally advanced tumors. This article reports our experience with neoadjuvant CRT for localized pancreatic cancer. Since 1995, 111 patients with radiographically localized, pathologically confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma have received neoadjuvant external beam radiation therapy (EBRT; median, 4500 cGy) with 5-flourouracil-based chemotherapy. Tumors were defined as potentially resectable (PR, n = 53) in the absence of arterial involvement and venous occlusion and locally advanced (LA, n = 58) with arterial involvement or venous occlusion by CT. Five patients (4.5%) were not restaged due to death (n = 3) or intolerance of therapy (n = 2). Twenty-one patients (19%) manifested distant metastatic disease on restaging CT. Twenty-eight patients with initially PR tumors (53%) and 11 patients with initially LA tumors (19%) were resected after CRT. Histologic examination revealed significant fibrosis in all resected specimens and two complete responses. Surgical margins were negative in 72%, and lymph nodes were negative in 70% of resected patients. Median survival in resected patients has not been reached at a median follow-up of 16 months. Neoadjuvant CRT provided an opportunity for patients with occult metastatic disease to avoid the morbidity of resection and resulted in tumor downstaging in a minority of patients with LA tumors. Survival after neoadjuvant CRT and resection appears to be at least comparable to survival after resection and adjuvant (postoperative) CRT.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Other 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Physics and Astronomy 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2013.
All research outputs
#7,473,822
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#2,627
of 6,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,999
of 124,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.