| Title |
Determining Clinically Important Differences in Health Status Measures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PharmacoEconomics, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2165/00019053-199915020-00003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Greg Samsa, David Edelman, Margaret L. Rothman, G. Rhys Williams, Joseph Lipscomb, David Matchar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Cyprus | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 166 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 36 | 21% |
| Unknown | 30 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 7% |
| Psychology | 12 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 32 | 18% |
| Unknown | 42 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,722,734
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics
#371
of 2,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,799
of 194,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics
#75
of 705 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 705 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.