You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A qualitative study of cancer care professionals’ experiences of working with migrant patients from diverse cultural backgrounds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025956 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alex Broom, Rhiannon Bree Parker, Emma Kirby, Renata Kokanović, Lisa Woodland, Zarnie Lwin, Eng-Siew Koh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 12 | 52% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 52% |
| Scientists | 7 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 36 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 8% |
| Psychology | 5 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 37 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,278,521
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#4,459
of 25,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,421
of 363,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#176
of 738 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 738 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.