You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Subsequent Event Risk in Individuals with Established Coronary Heart Disease: Design and Rationale of the GENIUS-CHD Consortium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1161/circgen.119.002470 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Riyaz Patel, Vinicius Tragante, Amand F. Schmidt, Raymond O. McCubrey, Michael V. Holmes, Laurence J. Howe, Kenan Direk, Axel Åkerblom, Karin Leander, Salim S. Virani, Karol A. Kaminski, Jochen D. Muehlschlegel, Hooman Allayee, Peter Almgren, Maris Alver, Ekaterina V. Baranova, Hassan Behlouli, Bram Boeckx, Peter S. Braund, Lutz P. Breitling, Graciela Delgado, Nubia E. Duarte, Marie-Pierre Dubé, Line Dufresne, Niclas Eriksson, Luisa Foco, Markus Scholz, Crystel M. Gijsberts, Charlotte Glinge, Yan Gong, Jaana Hartiala, Mahyar Heydarpour, Jaroslav A. Hubacek, Marcus Kleber, Daniel Kofink, Salma Kotti, Pekka Kuukasjärvi, Vei-Vei Lee, Andreas Leiherer, Petra A. Lenzini, Daniel Levin, Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen, Nicola Martinelli, Ute Mons, Christopher P. Nelson, Kjell Nikus, Anna P. Pilbrow, Rafal Ploski, Yan V. Sun, Michael W.T. Tanck, W.H. Wilson Tang, Stella Trompet, Sander W. van der Laan, Jessica Van Setten, Ragnar O. Vilmundarson, Chiara Viviani Anselmi, Efthymia Vlachopoulou, Lawien Al Ali, Eric Boerwinkle, Carlo Briguori, John F. Carlquist, Kathryn F. Carruthers, Gavino Casu, John Deanfield, Panos Deloukas, Frank Dudbridge, Thomas Engström, Natalie Fitzpatrick, Kim Fox, Bruna Gigante, Stefan James, Marja-Liisa Lokki, Paulo A. Lotufo, Nicola Marziliano, Ify R. Mordi, Joseph B. Muhlestein, Christopher Newton-Cheh, Jan Pitha, Christoph H. Saely, Ayman Samman-Tahhan, Pratik B. Sandesara, Andrej Teren, Adam Timmis, Frans Van de Werf, Els Wauters, Arthur A.M. Wilde, Ian Ford, David J. Stott, Ale Algra, Maria G. Andreassi, Diego Ardissino, Benoit J. Arsenault, Christie M. Ballantyne, Thomas O. Bergmeijer, Connie R. Bezzina, Simon C. Body, Eric H. Boersma, Peter Bogaty, Michiel Bots, Hermann Brenner, Jasper J. Brugts, Ralph Burkhardt, Clara Carpeggiani, Gianluigi Condorelli, Rhonda M. Cooper-DeHoff, Sharon Cresci, Nicolas Danchin, Ulf de Faire, Robert N. Doughty, Heinz Drexel, James C. Engert, Keith A.A. Fox, Domenico Girelli, Diederick E. Grobbee, Emil Hagström, Stanley L. Hazen, Claes Held, Harry Hemingway, Imo E. Hoefer, G. Kees Hovingh, Reza Jabbari, Julie A. Johnson, J. Wouter Jukema, Marcin P. Kaczor, Mika Kähönen, Jiri Kettner, Marek Kiliszek, Olaf H. Klungel, Bo Lagerqvist, Diether Lambrechts, Jari O. Laurikka, Terho Lehtimäki, Daniel Lindholm, B.K. Mahmoodi, Anke H. Maitland-van der Zee, Ruth McPherson, Olle Melander, Andres Metspalu, Anna Niemcunowicz-Janica, Oliviero Olivieri, Grzegorz Opolski, Colin N. Palmer, Gerard Pasterkamp, Carl J. Pepine, Alexandre C. Pereira, Louise Pilote, Arshed A. Quyyumi, A. Mark Richards, Marek Sanak, Agneta Siegbahn, Tabassome Simon, Juha Sinisalo, J. Gustav Smith, John A. Spertus, Steen Stender, Alexandre F.R. Stewart, Wojciech Szczeklik, Anna Szpakowicz, Jean-Claude Tardif, Jurriën M. ten Berg, Jacob Tfelt-Hansen, George Thanassoulis, Joachim Thiery, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Yolanda van der Graaf, Frank L.J. Visseren, Johannes Waltenberger, Peter E. Weeke, Pim Van der Harst, Chim C. Lang, Naveed Sattar, Vicky A. Cameron, Jeffrey L. Anderson, James M. Brophy, Guillaume Paré, Benjamin D. Horne, Winfried März, Lars Wallentin, Nilesh J. Samani, Aroon D. Hingorani, Folkert W. Asselbergs |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Finland | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 151 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 13% |
| Professor | 19 | 13% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 19% |
| Unknown | 56 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 15% |
| Unknown | 63 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2020.
All research outputs
#6,992,644
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
#482
of 1,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,345
of 365,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,071 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.