Title |
ESICM/ESCMID task force on practical management of invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, March 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00134-019-05599-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Massimo Antonelli, Manuel Cuenca-Estrella, George Dimopoulos, Sharon Einav, Jan J. De Waele, Jose Garnacho-Montero, Souha S. Kanj, Flavia R. Machado, Philippe Montravers, Yasser Sakr, Maurizio Sanguinetti, Jean-Francois Timsit, Matteo Bassetti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 127 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 14 | 11% |
United States | 8 | 6% |
Spain | 7 | 6% |
Mexico | 6 | 5% |
France | 4 | 3% |
Ecuador | 4 | 3% |
Saudi Arabia | 4 | 3% |
Brazil | 3 | 2% |
Japan | 3 | 2% |
Other | 28 | 22% |
Unknown | 46 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 91 | 72% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 14% |
Scientists | 16 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 204 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 27 | 13% |
Researcher | 22 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
Student > Master | 14 | 7% |
Other | 51 | 25% |
Unknown | 54 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 97 | 48% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 12 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
Energy | 3 | 1% |
Other | 12 | 6% |
Unknown | 67 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2023.
All research outputs
#534,400
of 25,463,091 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#491
of 5,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,191
of 364,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#16
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,463,091 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.