↓ Skip to main content

Instability of plane parallel shear flow (toward a mechanistic picture of how it works)

Overview of attention for article published in Pure and Applied Geophysics, March 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Instability of plane parallel shear flow (toward a mechanistic picture of how it works)
Published in
Pure and Applied Geophysics, March 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf00876917
Authors

Richard S. Lindzen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 41 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 28%
Professor 5 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Master 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 19 41%
Physics and Astronomy 8 17%
Engineering 5 11%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2016.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Pure and Applied Geophysics
#202
of 880 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,613
of 12,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pure and Applied Geophysics
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 880 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.