| Title |
Comparing simulation and experiment of a 2D granular Couette shear device
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The European Physical Journal E, August 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1140/epje/i2002-10160-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. Lätzel, S. Luding, H. J. Herrmann, D. W. Howell, R. P. Behringer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 58 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 32% |
| Researcher | 12 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 3% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 27 | 39% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 22 | 32% |
| Mathematics | 5 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Materials Science | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 4 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,830,208
of 25,378,162 outputs
Outputs from The European Physical Journal E
#150
of 703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,457
of 53,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The European Physical Journal E
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them