↓ Skip to main content

A cone-plate apparatus for the in vitro biochemical and molecular analysis of the effect of shear stress on adherent cells

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Cell Science, September 1995
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
15 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
A cone-plate apparatus for the in vitro biochemical and molecular analysis of the effect of shear stress on adherent cells
Published in
Methods in Cell Science, September 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf00996123
Authors

Adel M. Malek, Richard Ahlquist, Gary H. Gibbons, Victor J. Dzau, Seigo Izumo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 8%
Unknown 22 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 42%
Researcher 6 25%
Student > Master 3 13%
Professor 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 11 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 25%
Physics and Astronomy 3 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,798,287
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Cell Science
#60
of 1,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,568
of 22,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Cell Science
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,026 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them