| Title |
Confirmation of novel type 1 diabetes risk loci in families
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diabetologia, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00125-012-2450-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. D. Cooper, J. M. M. Howson, D. Smyth, N. M. Walker, H. Stevens, J. H. M. Yang, J.-X. She, G. S. Eisenbarth, M. Rewers, J. A. Todd, B. Akolkar, P. Concannon, H. A. Erlich, C. Julier, G. Morahan, J. Nerup, C. Nierras, F. Pociot, S. S. Rich, the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium |
| Abstract |
Over 50 regions of the genome have been associated with type 1 diabetes risk, mainly using large case/control collections. In a recent genome-wide association (GWA) study, 18 novel susceptibility loci were identified and replicated, including replication evidence from 2,319 families. Here, we, the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium (T1DGC), aimed to exclude the possibility that any of the 18 loci were false-positives due to population stratification by significantly increasing the statistical power of our family study. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 24% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 18% |
| Unknown | 12 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 11 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2012.
All research outputs
#14,142,788
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#4,303
of 5,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,906
of 246,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#40
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.