| Title |
Botanical insecticide and natural enemies: a potential combination for pest management against Tuta absoluta
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pest Science, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10340-018-01074-5 |
| Authors |
Marianne A. Soares, Mateus R. Campos, Luis C. Passos, Geraldo A. Carvalho, Marcelo M. Haro, Anne-Violette Lavoir, Antonio Biondi, Lucia Zappalà, Nicolas Desneux |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 114 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 20% |
| Researcher | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 37 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 43 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2019.
All research outputs
#5,841,820
of 23,136,540 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pest Science
#127
of 534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,179
of 437,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pest Science
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,136,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.