↓ Skip to main content

Natural rewards, neuroplasticity, and non-drug addictions

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropharmacology, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
19 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
90 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
6 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
237 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
589 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Natural rewards, neuroplasticity, and non-drug addictions
Published in
Neuropharmacology, April 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.03.010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher M. Olsen

Abstract

There is a high degree of overlap between brain regions involved in processing natural rewards and drugs of abuse. "Non-drug" or "behavioral" addictions have become increasingly documented in the clinic, and pathologies include compulsive activities such as shopping, eating, exercising, sexual behavior, and gambling. Like drug addiction, non-drug addictions manifest in symptoms including craving, impaired control over the behavior, tolerance, withdrawal, and high rates of relapse. These alterations in behavior suggest that plasticity may be occurring in brain regions associated with drug addiction. In this review, I summarize data demonstrating that exposure to non-drug rewards can alter neural plasticity in regions of the brain that are affected by drugs of abuse. Research suggests that there are several similarities between neuroplasticity induced by natural and drug rewards and that, depending on the reward, repeated exposure to natural rewards might induce neuroplasticity that either promotes or counteracts addictive behavior.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 589 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 563 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 120 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 92 16%
Student > Master 84 14%
Researcher 69 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 6%
Other 109 19%
Unknown 82 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 129 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 83 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 79 13%
Neuroscience 75 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 3%
Other 95 16%
Unknown 109 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2024.
All research outputs
#614,270
of 25,760,414 outputs
Outputs from Neuropharmacology
#82
of 4,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,076
of 121,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropharmacology
#2
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,760,414 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.