| Title |
Impact of GP gatekeeping on quality of care, and health outcomes, use, and expenditure: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp19x702209 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Poompong Sripa, Benedict Hayhoe, Priya Garg, Azeem Majeed, Geva Greenfield |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 29 | 44% |
| Ireland | 5 | 8% |
| Spain | 3 | 5% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 21 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 20% |
| Scientists | 13 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 163 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 9% |
| Researcher | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 13% |
| Unknown | 67 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 69 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 106. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#402,246
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#157
of 4,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,971
of 367,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#5
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.