| Title |
Patients’ Perceptions of Sharing in Decisions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2165/11592180-000000000-00000 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
France Légaré, Stéphane Turcotte, Dawn Stacey, Stéphane Ratté, Jennifer Kryworuchko, Ian D. Graham |
| Abstract |
Shared decision making is the process in which a healthcare choice is made jointly by the health professional and the patient. Little is known about what patients view as effective or ineffective strategies to implement shared decision making in routine clinical practice. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 6 | 38% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Argentina | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 69% |
| Scientists | 4 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 221 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 42 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 7% |
| Librarian | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 54 | 23% |
| Unknown | 41 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 11% |
| Psychology | 24 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 29 | 13% |
| Unknown | 49 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,080,100
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
#45
of 583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,324
of 186,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
#4
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.