↓ Skip to main content

Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data Interpretation by Evolutionary Multiobjective Clustering

Overview of attention for article published in IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data Interpretation by Evolutionary Multiobjective Clustering
Published in
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, March 2019
DOI 10.1109/tcbb.2019.2906601
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiangtao Li, Ka-Chun Wong

Abstract

In recent years, single-cell RNA sequencing reveals diverse cell genetics at unprecedented resolutions. Such technological advances enable researchers to uncover the functionally distinct cell subtypes such as hematopoietic stem cell subpopulation identification. However, most of the related algorithms have been hindered by the high-dimensionality and sparse nature of single-cell RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data. To address those problems, we propose a multiobjective evolutionary clustering based on adaptive non-negative matrix factorization (MCANMF) for multiobjective single-cell RNA-seq data clustering. Firstly, adaptive non-negative matrix factorization is proposed to decompose data for feature extraction. After that, a multiobjective clustering algorithm based on learning vector quantization is proposed to analyze single-cell RNA-seq data. To validate the effectiveness of MCANMF, we benchmark MCANMF against 15 state-of-the-art methods including seven feature extraction methods, seven clustering methods, and the kernel-based similarity learning method on six published single-cell RNA sequencing datasets comprehensively. When compared with those 15 state-of-the-art methods, MCANMF performs better than the others on those single-cell RNA sequencing datasets according to multiple evaluation metrics. Moreover, the MCANMF component analysis, time complexity analysis, and parameter analysis are conducted to demonstrate various properties of our proposed algorithm.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 30%
Other 1 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 10%
Unknown 5 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 3 30%
Energy 1 10%
Unknown 6 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2023.
All research outputs
#6,757,283
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
#130
of 1,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,499
of 363,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,081 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.