| Title |
Prognostic implications of prostatic urethral involvement in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Urology, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00345-019-02673-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aaron Brant, Marcus Daniels, Meera R. Chappidi, Gregory A. Joice, Nikolai A. Sopko, Andres Matoso, Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Max Kates |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 32% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 55% |
| Engineering | 2 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2019.
All research outputs
#4,252,303
of 23,136,540 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Urology
#395
of 2,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,804
of 351,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Urology
#16
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,136,540 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.