↓ Skip to main content

Comment on “Improving clinical diagnosis of early-stage cutaneous melanoma based on Raman spectroscopy”

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Cancer, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comment on “Improving clinical diagnosis of early-stage cutaneous melanoma based on Raman spectroscopy”
Published in
British Journal of Cancer, March 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41416-019-0430-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vincenzo De Giorgi, Federica Scarfì, Alessia Gori, Alessandro Topa, Luciana Trane, Francesca Portelli, Piero Covarelli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Social Sciences 1 14%
Engineering 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2019.
All research outputs
#15,566,052
of 23,136,540 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#9,261
of 10,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,601
of 350,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#68
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,136,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,515 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.