↓ Skip to main content

Developing a Flexible Platform for Crowdsourcing Historical Weather Records

Overview of attention for article published in Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developing a Flexible Platform for Crowdsourcing Historical Weather Records
Published in
Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, February 2019
DOI 10.1080/01615440.2018.1558138
Authors

Renée Sieber, Victoria Slonosky

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Librarian 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 9 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Unspecified 1 4%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 13 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2019.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History
#177
of 182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#393,805
of 455,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.