You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evidence of Vertical Transmission of the Snake Fungal Pathogen Ophidiomyces ophiodiicola
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Wildlife Diseases, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.7589/2018-10-250 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anne G. Stengle, Terence M. Farrell, Keenan S. Freitas, Craig M. Lind, Steven J. Price, Brian O. Butler, Tigran Tadevosyan, Marcos Isidoro-Ayza, Daniel R. Taylor, Megan Winzeler, Jeffrey M. Lorch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 17% |
| Canada | 2 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 9 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 18 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 17% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 17 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,807,800
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Diseases
#135
of 1,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,365
of 364,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Diseases
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.