| Title |
Quality standards in respiratory real‐life effectiveness research: the REal Life EVidence AssessmeNt Tool (RELEVANT): report from the Respiratory Effectiveness Group—European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Task Force
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical and Translational Allergy, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13601-019-0255-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicolas Roche, Jonathan D. Campbell, Jerry A. Krishnan, Guy Brusselle, Alison Chisholm, Leif Bjermer, Mike Thomas, Eric van Ganse, Maarten van den Berge, George Christoff, Jennifer Quint, Nikolaos G. Papadopoulos, David Price |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
| Romania | 3 | 10% |
| Panama | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 50% |
| Scientists | 7 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 29% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 29% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,035,312
of 23,136,540 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#100
of 673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,326
of 351,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,136,540 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.