| Title |
Identification of new risk factors for pneumonia: population-based case-control study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp09x472629 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yana Vinogradova, Julia Hippisley-Cox, Carol Coupland |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 112 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 17% |
| Researcher | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 16% |
| Unknown | 28 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 32 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2019.
All research outputs
#5,841,820
of 23,136,540 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,962
of 4,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,835
of 94,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#10
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,136,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.