| Title |
What is important to people living with dementia?: the ‘long-list’ of outcome items in the development of a core outcome set for use in the evaluation of non-pharmacological community-based health and social care interventions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Geriatrics, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12877-019-1103-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew J. E. Harding, Hazel Morbey, Faraz Ahmed, Carol Opdebeeck, Reena Lasrado, Paula R. Williamson, Caroline Swarbrick, Iracema Leroi, David Challis, Ingrid Hellstrom, Alistair Burns, John Keady, Siobhan T. Reilly |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 26% |
| Canada | 3 | 13% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 61% |
| Scientists | 6 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 19% |
| Unknown | 25 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 28 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,653,522
of 25,483,400 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#316
of 3,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,408
of 365,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#11
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,483,400 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.