| Title |
Dynamic monitoring of biomass of rice under different nitrogen treatments using a lightweight UAV with dual image-frame snapshot cameras
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-019-0418-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Haiyan Cen, Liang Wan, Jiangpeng Zhu, Yijian Li, Xiaoran Li, Yueming Zhu, Haiyong Weng, Weikang Wu, Wenxin Yin, Chi Xu, Yidan Bao, Lei Feng, Jianyao Shou, Yong He |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 142 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
| Researcher | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 61 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 25% |
| Engineering | 21 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 67 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2020.
All research outputs
#15,038,695
of 23,136,540 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#789
of 1,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,546
of 351,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#24
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,136,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,096 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.