You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparing the effects of massage and aromatherapy massage with lavender oil on sleep quality of cardiac patients: A randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ctcp.2019.03.005 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nesa Cheraghbeigi, Masoud Modarresi, Mansour Rezaei, Alireza Khatony |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 189 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 13% |
| Unknown | 96 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 47 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Unknown | 102 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,331,218
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
#224
of 1,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,072
of 365,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
#3
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.