| Title |
The pairing heap: A new form of self-adjusting heap
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Algorithmica, November 1986
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01840439 |
| Authors |
Michael L. Fredman, Robert Sedgewick, Daniel D. Sleator, Robert E. Tarjan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 31% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 21% |
| Unknown | 7 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 37 | 61% |
| Mathematics | 4 | 7% |
| Engineering | 4 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2018.
All research outputs
#5,504,362
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from Algorithmica
#55
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,790
of 11,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Algorithmica
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 417 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.