| Title |
All models are wrong, but some organoids may be useful
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-019-1677-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Benjamin E. Mead, Jeffrey M. Karp |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 11% |
| Australia | 2 | 7% |
| France | 2 | 7% |
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 48% |
| Scientists | 10 | 37% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 97 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 15% |
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 7% |
| Engineering | 7 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 28 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,497,639
of 25,622,179 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,016
of 4,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,250
of 365,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#43
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,622,179 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.