| Title |
Out-of-pocket payments in the context of a free maternal health care policy in Burkina Faso: a national cross-sectional survey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Economics Review, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13561-019-0228-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ivlabèhiré Bertrand Meda, Adama Baguiya, Valéry Ridde, Henri Gautier Ouédraogo, Alexandre Dumont, Seni Kouanda |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 5 | 19% |
| France | 3 | 11% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Norway | 1 | 4% |
| Comoros | 1 | 4% |
| Senegal | 1 | 4% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 4% |
| China | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 78% |
| Scientists | 3 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 23% |
| Researcher | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 16% |
| Unknown | 30 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 38 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,750,157
of 23,136,540 outputs
Outputs from Health Economics Review
#27
of 437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,973
of 351,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Economics Review
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,136,540 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 437 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them