| Title |
The early history of the factorial function
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archive for History of Exact Sciences, September 1991
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00389433 |
| Authors |
Jacques Dutka |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Researcher | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 4 | 27% |
| Engineering | 2 | 13% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,300,754
of 25,652,464 outputs
Outputs from Archive for History of Exact Sciences
#10
of 356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#447
of 16,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archive for History of Exact Sciences
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,652,464 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them