Title |
Cost analysis in a randomized trial of early closure of a temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer (EASY trial)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, March 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00464-019-06732-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jennifer Park, Eva Angenete, David Bock, Adiela Correa-Marinez, Anne K. Danielsen, Jacob Gehrman, Eva Haglind, Jens E. Jansen, Stefan Skullman, Anette Wedin, Jacob Rosenberg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 5 | 21% |
United States | 3 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
Romania | 1 | 4% |
Denmark | 1 | 4% |
Norway | 1 | 4% |
India | 1 | 4% |
Luxembourg | 1 | 4% |
Egypt | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 38% |
Members of the public | 7 | 29% |
Scientists | 6 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
Researcher | 9 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 9% |
Unknown | 41 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 27% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
Sports and Recreations | 2 | 2% |
Psychology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 10% |
Unknown | 45 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,360,346
of 23,136,540 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#259
of 6,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,844
of 351,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#7
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,136,540 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,136 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.