↓ Skip to main content

Epigenetic influences in the developmental origins of osteoporosis

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
Title
Epigenetic influences in the developmental origins of osteoporosis
Published in
Osteoporosis International, June 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00198-011-1671-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Holroyd, N. Harvey, E. Dennison, C. Cooper

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a major public health problem due to consequent fragility fractures; data from the UK suggest that up to 50% of women and 20% men aged 50 years will have an osteoporosis-related fracture in their remaining lifetime. Skeletal size and density increase from early embryogenesis through intrauterine, infant, childhood and adult life to reach a peak in the third to fourth decade. The peak bone mass achieved is a strong predictor of later osteoporosis risk. Epidemiological studies have demonstrated a positive relationship between early growth and later bone mass, both at peak and in later life, and also with reduced risk of hip fracture. Mother-offspring cohorts have allowed the elucidation of some of the specific factors in early life, such as maternal body build, lifestyle and 25(OH)-vitamin D status, which might be important. Most recently, the phenomenon of developmental plasticity, whereby a single genotype may give rise to different phenotypes depending on the prevailing environment, and the science of epigenetics have presented novel molecular mechanisms which may underlie previous observations. This review will give an overview of these latter developments in the context of the burden of osteoporosis and the wider data supporting the link between the early environment and bone health in later life.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 146 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 20%
Student > Master 30 20%
Other 11 7%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Researcher 11 7%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 28 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 32 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2012.
All research outputs
#15,241,801
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#2,337
of 3,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,941
of 112,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#21
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.