↓ Skip to main content

The importance of modeling spatial spillovers in public choice analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Public Choice, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
The importance of modeling spatial spillovers in public choice analysis
Published in
Public Choice, September 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11127-010-9714-6
Authors

James P. LeSage, Matthew Dominguez

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
China 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 54 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 26 46%
Social Sciences 7 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 18 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2017.
All research outputs
#8,732,105
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from Public Choice
#634
of 1,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,793
of 107,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Choice
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.