↓ Skip to main content

Are current therapies useful for the prevention of postherpetic neuralgia?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, March 1989
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Are current therapies useful for the prevention of postherpetic neuralgia?
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, March 1989
DOI 10.1007/bf02602345
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenneth E. Schmader, Stephanie Studenski

Abstract

To determine whether current therapies are useful in preventing postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) by analysis of study designs and pooled results. Meta-analysis of all controlled studies investigating PHN prevention in the immunocompetent host. Articles were identified through MEDLINE, Index Medicus and bibliographic reviews of major texts and review articles. Studies meeting eligibility criteria were independently assessed using explicit methodologic criteria for validity and generalizability in clinical trials. Pooled analysis was also performed where appropriate. Twenty-one investigations met eligibility criteria and primarily addressed the use of antiviral agents and corticosteroids. Among studies with strong designs, no evidence of benefit was found for acyclovir or corticosteroids. Pooled results showed no significant effect of acyclovir on the prevention of PHN (odds ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.56, 1.11). The strongest studies that found potential efficacy in PHN prevention involved adenosine monophosphate and idoxuridine in dimethyl sulfoxide, but problems with clinical application limit the use of these compounds. Outcome definition, compliance assessment, power estimation, and method of randomization were infrequently addressed aspects of design. Currently there is no proven useful therapy for the prevention of PHN. The benefits of acyclovir and corticosteroids are limited but key questions remain regarding these medications. A clear consensus definition of PHN is needed to improve future investigations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Professor 1 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 1995.
All research outputs
#3,505,282
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2,513
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#793
of 14,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them