| Title |
Results from a natural experiment: initial neighbourhood investments do not change objectively-assessed physical activity, psychological distress or perceptions of the neighbourhood
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12966-019-0793-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tamara Dubowitz, Madhumita Ghosh Dastidar, Andrea S. Richardson, Natalie Colabianchi, Robin Beckman, Gerald P. Hunter, Jennifer C. Sloan, Alvin K. Nugroho, Rebecca L. Collins |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 43% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
| Singapore | 1 | 7% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 21% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 117 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 42 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 7% |
| Psychology | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 48 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,146,603
of 25,709,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#754
of 2,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,096
of 365,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#18
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,709,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.