You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How rapid advances in imaging are defining the future of precision radiation oncology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Cancer, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41416-019-0412-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Beaton, Steve Bandula, Mark N. Gaze, Ricky A. Sharma |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 9 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 23% |
| United States | 4 | 13% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 77% |
| Scientists | 5 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 224 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 12% |
| Unknown | 81 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 17% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 20 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 6% |
| Engineering | 10 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 13% |
| Unknown | 103 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,404,740
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#552
of 11,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,924
of 367,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#11
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,040 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.