| Title |
Representation of biodiversity and ecosystem services in East Africa’s protected area network
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-019-01155-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fangli Wei, Shuai Wang, Bojie Fu, Yanxu Liu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 20% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Belgium | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Researcher | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 24 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 15 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 29 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2019.
All research outputs
#13,064,153
of 23,138,859 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#1,314
of 1,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,316
of 351,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#28
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,138,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.