You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Maternal pertussis vaccination and its effects on the immune response of infants aged up to 12 months in the Netherlands: an open-label, parallel, randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lancet Infectious Diseases, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s1473-3099(18)30717-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daan Barug, Inge Pronk, Marlies A van Houten, Florens G A Versteegh, Mirjam J Knol, Jan van de Kassteele, Guy A M Berbers, Elisabeth A M Sanders, Nynke Y Rots |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 7 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
| Australia | 4 | 7% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| India | 3 | 5% |
| Panama | 3 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 23 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 72% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 18% |
| Scientists | 4 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 146 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 55 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 67 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,140,021
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#1,504
of 6,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,229
of 365,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#32
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,091 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 93.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.