You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prospects for whale shark conservation in Eastern Indonesia through bajo traditional ecological knowledge and community-based monitoring
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation and Society, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.4103/0972-4923.92197 |
| Authors |
Natasha E Stacey, Johanna Karam, Mark G Meekan, Samuel Pickering, Jotham Ninef |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 2 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Portugal | 1 | 10% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 10% |
| India | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Mozambique | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 187 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 15% |
| Researcher | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 13% |
| Unknown | 49 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 63 | 32% |
| Environmental Science | 44 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 55 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2018.
All research outputs
#5,308,525
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Conservation and Society
#63
of 250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,157
of 250,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation and Society
#7
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.